In recent years, Thailand’s Visa Exemption (often called “visa-free entry”) has faced intense public scrutiny, especially after reports involving illegal foreign businesses, unlawful employment, and transnational crime. A common question arises:

“If it causes so many problems, why doesn’t Thailand simply cancel the visa-free policy?”

The answer is not a lack of political will. In practice, canceling visa-free entry is constrained by a combination of economic dependency, international legal commitments, and regional competition. This article explains why the issue is structurally complex—and what concrete tools are being used instead.

1. Visa-Free Entry Has Become an Economic Structure, Not a Temporary Measure

Many people assume visa-free entry is a short-term tourism tactic that can be switched off anytime. But for Thailand, the policy has become part of the country’s broader economic structure.

Thailand’s economy has faced global volatility, and tourism remains one of the most powerful engines for income distribution and jobs. When tens of millions of visitors arrive each year, the benefits go far beyond airlines and hotels. Tourism spending spreads to restaurants, retail, local services, and transportation networks—including day-to-day mobility for visitors across the country.

That is why visa-free entry is often treated as a form of policy infrastructure: once a country’s tourism and service supply chain is built around high volume and convenience, reversing the entry model becomes extremely costly.

2. The “Hidden Math” Why Lost Tourism Spending Can Matter More Than Visa Fees

It is easy to think that reintroducing visas would simply generate more government revenue through fees. But the core tradeoff is larger: visa fees are typically small compared with what a visitor spends during a trip.

In other words, a visa can become a “friction cost” that reduces demand—especially in an era where travelers compare destinations instantly. Thailand risks losing far more in overall tourism spending than it gains in administrative fee income if entry becomes slower, more complex, or less predictable.

3. A Key Fact People Should Know: Thailand Grants Visa Exemption to 93 Countries

At present, Thailand grants visa exemption to 93 countries and territories, allowing eligible travelers to stay up to 60 days per entry. This is one of the most open visa-exemption frameworks Thailand has implemented.

Expanding visa exemption at this scale does not happen by accident. It reflects a strategic decision to reduce barriers to travel and keep Thailand among the top choices for global tourists—especially while destinations in the region compete aggressively on convenience.

However, once visa-free entry covers 93 countries, any policy change becomes wide-reaching. Adjustments affect not only border control but also economic expectations, traveler confidence, and Thailand’s international relationships.

4. Why Can’t Thailand Just “Selectively Ban” Certain Countries or Groups

A frequent follow-up question is: if canceling visa exemption entirely is difficult, why not cancel it for only “problematic” countries or specific groups?

• Diplomatic signaling: Targeting certain countries can be interpreted as a political signal or discrimination, harming trust and bilateral relationships.
• Unpredictable rules: Frequent or unclear changes create uncertainty for travelers and businesses, which directly contradicts what tourism markets reward most: stability and convenience.
• Competitive disadvantage: In a region where neighbors simplify entry, adding friction—even for a subset—can still shift travel choices away from Thailand.

5. The “International Treaty” Lock: Legal and Diplomatic Constraints

Another misconception is that visa-free entry—especially with major partners—can be revoked at any time as a purely domestic policy choice. In reality, some arrangements function as binding commitments between governments.

• Bilateral treaty-style commitments: In certain cases, visa exemption is governed by formal agreements signed at the state-to-state level.
• No unilateral cancellation: Canceling unilaterally can be treated as a breach of commitment and may trigger diplomatic retaliation.
• Impact on Thai citizens: Under the principle of reciprocity, Thai citizens could lose the visa-free access they currently enjoy to partner countries.

6. Regional Competition: If Thailand Closes, Neighbors Open

Thailand does not operate in isolation. Across Southeast Asia, countries compete for the same visitor markets by simplifying entry requirements and extending permitted stays.

In today’s travel economy, a small increase in paperwork or waiting time can redirect demand. If Thailand raises barriers while neighboring destinations keep entry smooth, travelers may not stop traveling—they may simply choose a different country.

7. The Practical Direction: Not “Closing the Door,” but “Scanning” ETA and TDAC

Because full cancellation is constrained, Thailand’s practical direction is to reduce risk through technology-driven screening and stronger enforcement—separating legitimate travelers from high-risk individuals without dismantling the broader visa-exemption structure.

ETA (Electronic Travel Authorization)

The ETA concept is a pre-screening mechanism for visa-exempt travelers—similar in principle to systems used in other regions. The goal is to assess risk before travel.

• Pre-flight screening: risk checks can occur before a traveler boards a flight.
• Individual filtering: even within a visa-free framework, high-risk individuals can be flagged for additional scrutiny or refusal based on screening criteria.

TDAC (Thailand Digital Arrival Card)

The Thailand Digital Arrival Card (TDAC) is often described as a digital version of the TM.6 arrival form. It requires travelers to submit key details—such as accommodation and travel plans—in advance, strengthening the government’s ability to track and analyze patterns when suspicious activity occurs.

Together, these tools aim to shift the approach from “paper barriers” to “data-enabled border management,” improving visibility and control without returning to a rigid, old-style visa wall.

Conclusion

Calling for an immediate cancellation of Thailand’s visa-free policy may sound decisive, but it overlooks structural realities: economic dependence on tourism, regional competition for travelers, and legal/diplomatic constraints—especially where state-to-state commitments apply.

The more practical debate is not about “closing the door,” but about demanding clear, enforceable screening and effective implementation of tools like ETA and TDAC, alongside strong law enforcement at border checkpoints. This is how Thailand can better separate high-risk individuals from legitimate travelers—without undermining the broader travel ecosystem that supports the economy.

FAQ